Report: Most Vulnerable Road Users Receive the Least Funding

Posted By on February 10, 2010

The Alliance for Biking and Walking recently released a 2010 Benchmarking Report in order to measure the progress of efforts on bicycling and walking in the U.S. The overall conclusion of the report is that bicyclists and pedestrians receive a pitiful share (1.2%) of transportation dollars and yet, are at a much larger risk on our roadways where a disproportionate percentage of transportation dollars go toward auto-based infrastructure.

As the eight largest city in the country, the percentage of San Diegans who took full advantage of year round perfect weather to commute by bicycle was a pitiful 0.9%. The Complete Streets Act in California which was signed in 2008 and ensures that the design of all streets will enable safe access for all users was adopted by the city of San Diego. Yet to date, the city has done nothing to increase staffing to show the full support of that adoption. The sole bicycle coordinator at the City, Brad Jacobsen, was scheduled to retire in 2009 and the city has still not finalized plans on continuing that position.

Despite the gloomy report, San Diego has published very ambitious goals to increase bicycling [pdf link]  to a 10% mode share by 2020. Unlike Portland whose successful efforts to promote bicycling include trying out innovative bicycling facilities; leading bicycle promotion activities like Bike to Work Day and Ciclovía; San Diego’s plans to promote bicycling have been more modest. The plans include the creation and connection of bikeways, maintaining existing bicycle infrastructure, increasing the percentage of bicycle transit trips, and increasing public awareness of bicycling.

Photo from the Alliance for Bicycling and Walking

Facing a $179 million budget deficit and a crumbling infrastructure, the city of San Diego needs to step it up a notch if it really intends to meet the goals outlined in the Bicycle Master Plan. Maintaining existing bicycle infrastructure that is poorly connected is the very minimum that cyclists expect from the city. In order to really meet and exceed the goals outlined in the Bicycle Master Plan put forth by the city, San Diego needs to be a vanguard in promoting bicycling as a utilitarian form of transportation. I will be outlining some ideas in a forthcoming post.

In the meantime, you are encouraged to respond with your ideas or criticisms. What can San Diego do to ensure that 10% of all trips are made on a bicycle?


Comments

One Response to “Report: Most Vulnerable Road Users Receive the Least Funding”

  1. Jay Porter says:

    The City could achieve that goal in 1 year at no cost:

    1) Assess a “road services impact fee” of $5000 for each new automotive parking space built, public or private
    2) Give a $500 credit against development fees (fund permitting) for each parking space removed from privately owned property
    3) Assess a $250/year road services impact fee against all exisiting publicly accessible spaces
    4) Assess a $50/year road services impact fee on all privately used spaces (garages, driveways, etc.)
    5) Convert all free public spaces on City roadways to either 15 minute parking, enforceable 24/7, or paid/metered parking, enforceable 24/7, or turn them into bike and/or ped lanes with red zones.
    6) All excess money from the assessments, apply to developing separated bikeways on major arterials (Genessee, Mission Gorge, etc).

    Within one year, I’d expect bicycling would become 20% or more of transportation. Plus the local economy would boom as money was shifted from car expenses (which leave the city) to discretionary spending and bike expenses (which often stay in the city)

Proudly Powered by WordPress | Theme by The Cloisters | Entries RSS  Comments RSS

Original images and content is owned by BikeSD and is not to be used without permission.